This is why ICC suspended Cricket Association of Nepal (CAN)

ICC Board Meeting - © ICC

The ICC Chief Executives’ Committee and ICC Board meetings was held at its headquarter in Dubai on 24th April this year. ICC decided to suspend CAN in light of the court case between CAN and Ad hoc Committee established by Nepal Government's National Sports Council (NSC).

As a result there has been a vacuum of cricket leadership in Nepal. The Board accused Nepal of breaching Article 2.9 of the ICC’s Articles of Association, which prohibits government interference and requires free and fair elections.

Also, the suspension will mean that CAN will not be receiving any funding from ICC however the cricket teams from Nepal will be able to feature in ICC events.

ICC puts further emphasis that the suspension will nit be lifted until CAN becomes free of government interference and that ICC is working with the stakeholders to lift the suspension.

"The Board maintained that it doesn’t accept government interference in the affairs of its Members as it wants all its Members to work independently with the best intentions of promoting and developing the game in their respective territories in accordance with the ICC’s objectives and strategy. It added that until such time as the CAN becomes free of government interference and is properly structured to begin exploiting the tremendous cricket talent and opportunities that exist in Nepal, the membership of CAN will remain suspended."

Indian Police Officers Arrested In Nepal by Nepal Police

Nepal police have arrested five Indian police officers including an inspector from Sanagaun today.

The Indian police officers were said to have been in civil uniform and were arrested while they were heading towards Achham to look for an alleged murderer of a doctor in Punjab.
The plain-clothed policemen were carrying arms, according to the National News Agency of Nepal.

Nepal Police have seized an AK-47 rifle and its 25 round of ammunition, a pistol and its 12 rounds of ammunition from the Indian Police..

Nepalese-born Australian residents were the fastest-growing overseas-born community.

The new figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics show that the proportion of Australian residents born overseas has soared to its highest level in 120 years.

In 2015, more than 28 per cent of the population were born overseas, the largest proportion since 1895, according to the research released on Wednesday. The percentage has increased every year for the past 15 years.

Nepalese-born Australian residents were the fastest-growing overseas-born community. Their numbers have swelled more than 11-fold over the past 10 years, from just over 3800 people in 2005 to more than 43,500 in 2015.

Although their population is small compared to other overseas-born groups, the rate of increase - nearly 28 percent a year, on average - is well above other groups. For example, the next fastest growing groups - those born in Pakistan, Brazil and India - increased their numbers by around three-fold over the same period.

The steepest decline among the top 50 countries of birth was for Serbian-born residents, followed by those born in Poland.


As the chart above shows, the share of Australian residents born overseas last peaked in the late 1890s. Nearly 30 per cent of the population were foreign-born at the time following the first mining boom and the surge in Chinese migration in the gold rush era, according to Anna Boucher, a senior lecturer in the University of Sydney's School of Social and Political Sciences.

"Then there was the introduction of 'White Australia' and the effective closing of borders, with the exception of some Commonwealth migration, up until the post-war period," Dr Boucher said.

This explains the steep decline in the share of overseas-born Australians during the first half of the 20th century.

The dramatic turnaround in the mid-1940s reflects the shift to a mass migration policy, driven by a belief that Australia must "populate or perish" to survive in the post-war era. A new migration scheme aimed to increase the population by one percent a year.

The dip in the late-1970s relates to low migration intake under the Whitlam and Fraser governments. Since 2000, the figure has risen steadily. "The story there is around bipartisan support for temporary migration," Dr Boucher said - in particular, rapid increases in the number of working holiday makers and international students.

Australia ranks fourth among OECD countries for the largest proportion of overseas-born residents, behind Luxembourg (43.7 per cent), Switzerland (28.3 per cent) and New Zealand (28.2 per cent) according to 2013 statistics from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

"Australia has traditionally had a high proportion of migrants, but we've now hit a peak not seen since the late 1800s," said Beidar Cho from the ABS.

Nepali-born nurse Pushpa Belbase, who joined her husband in Sydney in 1996, said the first few years were difficult but now, she wouldn't live elsewhere.

"It was hard to leave home - our parents are still over there; there was no one here to support us in that time … but now I feel like Australia is home," she said.

"Two of my children were born here. It's a better life than Nepal. It's easy to survive and you can get a good education here. I'm so happy we came."

source: Sydney Morning Herald

China and Pakistan Go Hand in Hand Against India at the UN

In a major disappointment for India, China once again blocked India's proposal to ban Jaish-e-Mohammed chief Masood Azhar.

After the attack on the IAF base at Pathankot on January 2, India in February wrote to the UN calling for immediate action to list Azhar under the al-Qaida Sanctions Committee.

According to sources, 14 out of 15 countries were willing to designate Azhar, but China alone decided to go against all the others in the bid.

China did not give any reason on their move in their written communication which just says that they want to put a hold on India's proposition.

The US, UK and France had strongly supported the move and the other nations had also expressed their consent to proceed with the action on Azhar.

But China, one of the five permanent members of the UN group with veto powers, collaborated with Pakistan to block the bid, sources add.

China is now the only country that has stood up for Masood Azhar more than once.